Hi Andreas, I want to know if a client can assume that they will receive messages in the order in which they are sent. I have found that in certain cases this does not occur (when messages are sent at a rate much faster than they are processed at the receiving end). However, if the threadpool limits are changed for the jms consumer such that the maximum threads and minimum threads are set to 1 (rather than 5 which is the default) the messages are received in the order in which they were sent. Is this a valid action to take to solve this problem and are there any side-effects that could occur due to changing this setting? Should this action need to be taken or should the default thread pool setting work?    More>>