Specifying abstract classes
1 posts in topic
Flat View  Flat View
Older Post First |   Reply to Topic
TOPIC ACTIONS:
 

Posted By:   Andres_Vignaga
Posted On:   Tuesday, July 31, 2001 06:07 PM

I'm looking for an alternate way for specifying that a class is abstract, that is, not writing its name in italics:


Should I use a stereotype, a tagged value or a constraint?.

Report | Quote This | Send private message | Reply | Print

Re: Specifying abstract classes

Posted By:   Simon_Ablett  
Posted On:   Thursday, August 30, 2001 03:47 AM

Andres,
Why do you want to find an alternative way? The whole point of a standard such as UML is that it facilitates a common method for representing analysis/design information. If you try to find alternative approaches you are in danger of obfuscating things.
Regards.
Report | Quote This | Send private message | Reply | Print
About | Sitemap | Contact