Why do we need EJB Object?
1 posts in topic
Flat View  Flat View

Posted By:   Deepak_Kalra
Posted On:   Sunday, March 7, 2004 07:06 AM

We Know Client invokes the method on EJB Object rather then

on actual bean instace.Why cant we directly create the bean

instance to invoke methods?

Re: Why do we need EJB Object?

Posted By:   Vijayanandraj_Amaladoss  
Posted On:   Sunday, March 7, 2004 09:53 PM

Container can apply services, such as access control, on behalf of the EJB simply by setting attributes in the EJB configuration information. To do this, the container must have some way of intercepting the method call from the client. When it receives such a method call, the container can then decide if any extra services need to be applied before forwarding the method call on to the bean itself. Sticking with the security example, the container would examine security information configured for the EJB before deciding whether to forward the method call to the bean or to reject it. So it is necessary to interpose between the client and the bean to deliver such services.

The interception is performed by a server-side object called the EJBObject (not to be confused with the interface of the same name). The EJBObject acts as a server-side proxy for the bean itself, and it is the
EJBObject that actually implements the EJB's remote interface.

The EJBObject applies the required extra services and then forwards the method calls on to the bean itself. The EJBObject is separate from the RMI stub and skeleton that provide the remote procedure call capability.

About | Sitemap | Contact